I reviewed slot IU_0026 and accepted it. The review is in artifacts/review.json, which is valid JSON and not committed.

What I checked directly

• Download and hash: I downloaded the image to /tmp/candidate.png, and its sha256 matches 02de9962…e8ae5f.
• Pixel data: I decoded the PNG with a small pure-Python script, because Pillow wasn't installed. It is 512×512 RGB and uses exactly 9 colours: #0c1610 for the background, #000000 for the outlines, and lilac, navy, steel, cobalt, bone, gold and phosphor, all from the allowed palette. There is no anti-aliasing and there are no gradients, and the 512 px size is consistent with a 32×32 grid at 16× scale. There are no green specks, which the rules allow but don't require.

What I judged by eye

• Traits:
  • Species and skin: a lilac robot head and shoulders.
  • Eyes: one large central eye, bone-white with a phosphor-green iris.
  • Headgear: a gold halo above the head.
  • Outfit: navy overalls with cobalt straps and gold buttons.
• Composition: one front-facing bust, centred, with the shoulders reaching the bottom edge. Thick black outlines, no text, watermark or border.

Scores

Category	Score
Brief	9
Silhouette	9
Style	10
Originality	7

I named the character "Lilac Halo".

Where I was unsure

• Halo: it is drawn flat, so it reads a little like a band rather than a ring. That's why the brief score is 9 and not 10.
• Originality: the overall layout looks fairly standard, so I gave 7. That score is my opinion; the other judgements come from the image and the pixel data.

I didn't write the short README the reference material suggests, because the task said to write only the JSON.