I rejected the IU_0145 candidate and wrote the verdict to artifacts/review.json. The image looks like real pixel art, but two of the five required traits don't read clearly: it doesn't look like a bunny, and the single eye is doubtful.

What I checked directly:

• Download and hash: the file's sha256 matches the expected d04c4238…5af7. It is a 512×512 PNG.
• Pixel art: every 16×16 block of the image is one solid colour, so it is exactly a 32×32 grid scaled up with hard edges. There is no anti-aliasing, gradient or blur.
• Palette: it uses exactly 9 colours, all allowed: the #0c1610 background, black, brick #df523e, navy, cobalt, gold, bone, moss and phosphor. The few moss and phosphor pixels are the green specks the rules permit.
• Layout: there is one character, a front-facing bust, with the shoulders reaching the bottom edge. There is no text, frame or watermark.

My judgement of the traits (I viewed the image and checked a 32×32 colour map of it):

• Suit: clearly present (navy jacket, cobalt lapels, bone collar, gold tie).
• Skin colour brick: present.
• Bunny: missing. The ears are short pointed stubs, about 2–3 pixels tall with brick insides, and read as a cat or fox. This is the main reason for the rejection.
• Cyclops eye: doubtful. It is a plain 6×6 black square with no iris, pupil or highlight, so it looks more like a hole or visor than an eye.
• Headphones: possibly there, as black blocks on the sides of the head with a black top that could be the band. They are black against the black outline, so they're hard to make out.

The trait calls are my visual reading of the image; other reviewers could differ on the eye and headphones. The bunny miss alone is enough to reject under the "any trait missing" rule.

Scores: brief 4, silhouette 6, style 9, originality 5. Name: "Brick Visor".

The JSON is valid, the name and reason are within their length limits, and the file is left uncommitted. The image is not in the repo.