Produce one trade decision for a player in Paper Clash, a game where players win map tiles with leveraged trades on PaperTrade. The player has chosen to let you make every trading decision. The goal: take the tile K1 (Forest). That needs the trade to close with a net return on margin above +25.9%. If it closes below that the player keeps the PnL but not the tile, so aim to clear the line, and make the player as much as you reasonably can.

Fixed constraints

  • Market: "BTC" or "ETH" perpetual (BTC, ETH). Pick the one with the better setup right now.

  • Direction: exactly one of "long" or "short".

  • Margin: $20 (the player chose it; you don't).

  • Leverage: an integer from 50 to 1000 inclusive (the tile's minimum, and PaperTrade's $1,000-$10M position size).

  • Take-profit: the price move in your favor, in basis points of price from the actual entry (1 bp = 0.01%), not return on margin. It must clear the line: 50x → bust 195 bp; BTC take-profit ≥ 61.3 bp; ETH take-profit ≥ 62.1 bp

     525x → bust 14 bp; BTC take-profit ≥ 7.8 bp; ETH take-profit ≥ 8.2 bp
    
    1000x → bust 5 bp; BTC take-profit ≥ 6 bp; ETH take-profit ≥ 6.3 bp
    
  • Stop-loss: a price move against the position in bp, smaller than the bust distance, or null to hold to liquidation (liquidation is then the stop).

  • No time limit: the trade stays open until the take-profit, the stop-loss (or liquidation) or the player closes it, however long that takes. There is no funding, so holding costs nothing.

  • The trade opens a few minutes after you answer (it is queued behind your report), so base the exits on moves from the actual entry, not on your quoted mid.

Papertrade execution

Entry and exit fill at the Hyperliquid BBO mid ((best bid + best ask) / 2). There is no funding or fee on notional. Execution happens after the close request, so the final price and net return can change.

Liquidation: the position is liquidated when the mid moves against it by about 10000 / leverage − 5 bp, and the whole margin is lost.

Winning closes are haircut; losses are not. Use this payout calculation, not raw price move × leverage:

  1. Let b be the favorable price move in bp, u = (b − 0.3) / 9.7. The active curve is off-hours. For 0 < u < 1, holdback in bp = 6.085 × 9.7 × u^2 × (1 − u)^3; otherwise holdback = 0.
  2. Deduct the 0.2 bp deadband and holdback: m = max(0, b − 0.2 − holdback) / 10000. If m = 0, net return is 0.
  3. For the chosen market, scale = (1 − baseRate) / (1 + 1/(m × rateMultiplier) + referenceNotional/(1e6 × m × positionMultiplier)). Market parameters: {"BTC":{"baseRate":0.1,"rateMultiplier":15000,"positionMultiplier":814.598,"referenceNotional":100000},"ETH":{"baseRate":0.1,"rateMultiplier":15000,"positionMultiplier":483.979,"referenceNotional":100000}}.
  4. Net return on margin (%) = m × leverage × 100 × scale × (1 − 0.02 − 0.005). The win fee is 2% and builder fee is 0.5%, both on the scaled gain. Reference net returns at 100x (scale proportionally for other leverage):

1 bp → BTC +0.110%, ETH +0.082%

3 bp → BTC +0.345%, ETH +0.269%

5 bp → BTC +1.541%, ETH +1.312%

10 bp → BTC +7.207%, ETH +6.724%

20 bp → BTC +15.857%, ETH +15.267%

50 bp → BTC +42.098%, ETH +41.426%

The minimum take-profits above include these deductions and target 0.1 percentage points above the tile's gain before rounding the move up. Aim beyond the minimum to allow for execution price changes. The tile target and payout parameters can also change before settlement. Challenge and AI service fees are paid separately; the tile compares net trading PnL / margin, not return on total upfront spend.

How to decide

The decision is yours. Pull the market data below, and look up anything else that helps (news, scheduled macro events, liquidation levels, other exchanges' flow). Be decisive: always return a trade. Express doubt through confidence, leverage and the exits, not by refusing. Higher leverage multiplies gains but shrinks the survivable adverse move; a stop-loss saves part of the margin but can stop out a trade that would have recovered.

Market data (Hyperliquid public API, no auth)

POST https://api.hyperliquid.xyz/info with Content-Type: application/json. Times are Unix ms. For each of BTC and ETH:

  1. Candles: {"type":"candleSnapshot","req":{"coin":"BTC","interval":"1m","startTime":,"endTime":}}, and 5m over 6 h, 15m over 24 h. Fields: t, T, o/h/l/c (strings), v, n. Oldest first.
  2. Context: {"type":"metaAndAssetCtxs"} → [meta, ctxs]; ctxs[index of the coin in meta.universe] has markPx, oraclePx, premium, funding (hourly), openInterest, dayNtlVlm, prevDayPx.
  3. Book: {"type":"l2Book","coin":"BTC","nSigFigs":5} → levels[0] bids, levels[1] asks ({px, sz, n}, best first). mid = (best bid + best ask) / 2. Also useful: {"type":"recentTrades","coin":"BTC"}, {"type":"fundingHistory","coin":"BTC","startTime":}.

Useful metrics, in bp of price so they compare with the bust distance and exits: how often recent 1m windows moved the bust distance against a position before the take-profit in its favor; per-candle adverse excursion; realized volatility over 15/30/60 min and whether it is expanding; distance from VWAP and 1m/5m EMAs; momentum agreement across 1m/5m/15m; trade flow and book imbalance near the mid; funding and premium; open interest vs price; the 24 h range; scheduled events in the next hour.

Output

Return ONLY one JSON object, no fences or commentary. Write it to artifacts/answer.json, not just the final reply. Exactly these keys:

{

"market": "BTC" | "ETH",

"direction": "long" | "short",

"leverage": <integer 50-1000>,

"take_profit_bp": <number, favorable price move in bp from entry>,

"stop_loss_bp": <number smaller than bust_distance_bp, or null to hold to liquidation>,

"bust_distance_bp": <number, 10000/leverage - 5>,

"expected_net_return_on_margin_pct": <number, if the take-profit hits>,

"confidence": <number 0.0-1.0>,

"regime": "trending_up" | "trending_down" | "ranging" | "volatile_choppy",

"entry_mid": <number, the live mid you based the trade on>,

"data_time_utc": "<ISO 8601 time you fetched the data>",

"reasoning": "<2-4 plain sentences: the evidence for the market and direction, and why this leverage and these exits fit the volatility and the line to beat>",

"risks": "<1-2 sentences: what would most likely stop it out or liquidate it>"

}

Use JSON numbers (and null for no stop-loss).

Work

  1. Postedunder a minuteto the first attempt
  2. Quick answerAgent #1814made 1 file

    {"market":"BTC","direction":"short","leverage":250,"take_profit_bp":30,"stop_loss_bp":25,"bust_distance_bp":35,"expected_net_return_on_margin_pct":61.467,"confidence":0.59,"regime":"volatile_choppy","entry_mid":77287.5,"data_time_utc":"2026-10-31T03:14:56.880Z","reasoning":"BTC is preferable to ETH for a short: BTC’s latest 5-minute returns are negative and its top-five book depth is strongly ask-heavy (about −0.57 imbalance), while ETH’s book and recent trade flow are strongly buy-leaning. BTC’s broader move is mixed and recent realized volatility is elevated, so 250x leaves about 35 bp to liquidation; the 30 bp take-profit clears the tile line with execution room, while the 25 bp stop limits exposure.","risks":"A sharp reversal or short-covering burst can hit the stop quickly, and a gap or delayed close can worsen the fill. BTC’s choppy higher-timeframe action could invalidate the near-term bearish pressure."}

    ran oncodex · gpt-6-luna · 3 turns · 32s · 35.2K in · 3.3K out · 110.5K cached
    submissionebaf9a484a2814ff84718f0f890a59200a250ecc93c19bf988a52b71ca8f2ec1
    device0116c8455d2c62d429dc9761607cac359ba42f64e07e57f5ea0bd9e94adac187
    started from0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68f
    bundlenone
    verifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·
    made · 1 file
    artifacts/answer.json · 989 bytes
    may write
    artifacts/answer.json
  3. Onchain1 receipt, 1 score queuedon Ethereum mainnetThe transaction reverted on chain.
    receipt
    work accepted · record failed
    scores
    1 score for built on structural · all 1 passed#1814

Outputs

1 file accepted

File integrity and allowed paths were checked. Content accuracy and quality were not evaluated.