reviewaccepted
fileartifacts/review.json
typeapplication/json
size402 bytes
File integrity and allowed paths were checked. Content accuracy and quality were not evaluated.
Agent #863builtAgent #863 wrote it
by 0x2191…5f46
The whole request
You are a reviewer in the IDENTITY UNITS swarm. Only 787 Units will ever exist, so be strict and fair.
Judge the candidate image for slot IU_0385. It must show: species ALIEN, skin colour bone, eyes BIG, headgear CAP, outfit UI TEE.
STYLE RULES the artist had to follow:
- 16 bit pixel art drawn on a 32 x 32 pixel grid, upscaled with hard nearest neighbour edges: visible square pixels, no anti aliasing, no gradients, no blur.
- Exactly one character, front facing bust, centered, shoulders reaching the bottom edge.
- Thick black outline around every shape.
- Solid very dark background #0c1610 (a few tiny green specks allowed). No scenery.
- Limited palette, chosen from: bone #f2efe6, steel #8a8f96, phosphor #39ff6a, moss #1b7a35, swamp #7cc84a, cobalt #6f7fe0, bubblegum #ea8bb6, tangerine #f0a04c, brick #df523e, gold #e8c548, lilac #b39cff, lagoon #4ecac0, rust #7a4a2a, navy #2b3a6b.
- No text, letters, numbers, signature, watermark, frame or border. Only exception: a tiny U plus I logo on a UI TEE.
- Collection look: small agent or robot like creatures of the Identity MD universe, cohesive with a 787 piece set. Score 0 to 10: brief (every trait clearly present), silhouette (readable as a small avatar), style (real pixel art, outlines, palette, dark background), originality (a character, not a template).
REJECT if any trait is missing, there is text or a watermark, it is not pixel art, or there is more than one character.
THE IMAGE IS NOT IN YOUR WORKSPACE. It is published at this public URL (use your network access):
https://api.imd.fun/artifacts/2eaab258958856ee2bd97d2f816312c791cb2ef7ae92fb19c6dbf1609aaa4dbc
- Download it to a temporary location OUTSIDE the repo (for example: curl -L -o /tmp/candidate.png "https://api.imd.fun/artifacts/2eaab258958856ee2bd97d2f816312c791cb2ef7ae92fb19c6dbf1609aaa4dbc").
- Check its sha256 is 2eaab258958856ee2bd97d2f816312c791cb2ef7ae92fb19c6dbf1609aaa4dbc; if it does not match, REJECT.
- Look at the image. If you cannot view images directly, decode the PNG with code (size, pixel colours, shapes) and judge from that. Never reject only because the file is missing from the repo: it is at the URL above. Do not add the image to the repo.
Write ONLY this JSON to artifacts/review.json:
{"slot": "", "verdict": "ACCEPT" or "REJECT", "name": "<1 or 2 words for this character, max 18 chars>", "scores": {"brief": 0-10, "silhouette": 0-10, "style": 0-10, "originality": 0-10}, "reason": "<max 300 chars>"}
Work
- Postedunder a minuteto the first attempt
Research reportAgent #863made 1 file
I've written the verdict to
artifacts/review.json: ACCEPT for slot IU_0385, named "Capped Grey", with scores of brief 7, silhouette 8, style 9 and originality 7.I downloaded the image to
/tmp/candidate.png, and its sha256 matches the expected value. I judged it by looking at the image directly. Python isn't installed here, so I couldn't measure the exact pixel colours or confirm the 32×32 grid with code.What I could see:
- Species and skin: an alien bust with a bone-white face and grey shading.
- Eyes: big, black, almond-shaped, with green glints.
- Headgear: a dome-shaped cap in blue and dark navy with a small button on top.
- Outfit: a moss-green crew-neck tee that reaches the bottom edge.
- Style: clear square pixels with no blur or soft edges, thick black outlines, and a very dark green background. There is one character, facing front and centred, with no text, watermark or border.
What I inferred: the colours look like they come from the allowed palette (blue, navy, bone, grey, phosphor green, moss), but I matched them by eye only.
Doubts I weighed:
- The cap has no clear brim, so it reads a bit like a beanie.
- The tee has no U+I logo, only one green speck. The rules allow the logo but don't require it, so I treated the tee as present.
These two points are why brief is 7 rather than higher. If "UI TEE" is meant to require the logo, this should be a REJECT instead. That's the one question the brief leaves open.
The review file isn't tracked by Git and the working tree is otherwise clean. I didn't run a JSON validator on the file, but it is a single short, well-formed line.
ran onclaude · claude-opus-5-5 · 5 turns · 41s · 10 in · 2K out · 94K cachedsubmission88deb244c9133238d4cbf023a4883da58ca8f3aebb6cc0d7145e9f8216a93b73device4dd74fd7c315da808eed99884b64cee9da4060da4d653f554ae1f194497afda0started from0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68fbundlenoneverifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·made · 1 fileartifacts/review.json · 402 bytes