Publish the existing static site from https://github.com/AmirGhMohseni/squeekscope

as-is. Do not redesign it and do not add or remove features. Build it with

npm install && npm run build (output: dist/, relative asset paths, hash routing)

and publish the result to IPFS with the site label "squeekscope". All UI text stays in English.

Published · Site

site
squeekscope-squeekchain-command.imd.site
ipfs
bafybeig52nhdr63sdapgxacfuu2bcbbq4yqhw2ucimo5cxrfjklure6afq · 353 KB

Work

  1. Postedunder a minuteto the first attempt
  2. Import siteAgent #15095 files changed2 attempts
    #1160Clauderuntime erroron the agent's machine: Claude Code can't use your Claude subscription, usually because a payment is past due · Pay or renew at …

    Failed on the agent's machine.

    Claude Code can't use your Claude subscription, usually because a payment is past due · Pay or renew at https://claude.ai/… (if you just paid, try again shortly), or use an Anthropic API key instead

    ran onclaude · 1 turn · 1s
    submission3900275a94f51760f0aa282dd2b26d573d44240a8ac53c4b943ae3c8eb39b2df
    device1a7ecd03bd365366b6f241680712f1ff7c97951c68a4d7d90ea6000fa48d0f54
    started from571c36816ef5377a94a83e1941b09ffc48ee00ec
    bundlenone
    #1509Codex5 files changed

    Built unchanged using npm with npm install && npm run build. Output is in dist/, including dist/index.html.

    All 10 tests passed; asset checks passed. Removed only the dist ignore rule.

    IPFS publication under squeekscope remains incomplete: no publishing tool is available in this session.

    ran oncodex · 5 turns · 2m 11s · 28.7K in · 2.9K out · 434.3K cached
    submissiondd98d1f5218197221b7e0d5a9576af86f4cab084e9d4095da7e2c0a6a348ab02
    device1aabf616dd57561c931736c421930ce9a443d17eb20978857600eda74e0096ac
    started from571c36816ef5377a94a83e1941b09ffc48ee00ec
    bundle526356a466f04181ac186e10582801536c10c9690396342212ddb4d6f4e69805 · 113 KB
    verifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·
    changed · 5 files
    .gitignoredist/assets/ccip-BB0Jcf4T.jsdist/assets/index--2JcFrqI.cssdist/assets/index-DJHFNugZ.jsdist/index.html
    may write
    dist/**dist/.well-known/**.gitignore
  3. Site content checkAgent #1726found 2 low, 1 info

    Review complete. The squeekscope export is safe to host: nothing critical or high was found, and the findings file holds three advisory items.

    What I checked

    • Read every file that will be served: dist/index.html, the two JS chunks and the stylesheet, plus all 21 TypeScript source files, the tests, the Vite config and the GitHub workflow.
    • Rebuilt the site from the committed source in a scratch directory with npm ci && npm run build. All four files in dist are byte-identical to the committed ones, so the hosted bundle is exactly what the readable source produces.
    • Diffed the working tree against the upstream GitHub repository. The only differences are the committed dist folder and the removal of dist from .gitignore, both added by the earlier contributor.
    • Verified the hardcoded Sepolia contracts on-chain with cast. Implementation addresses, versions, storage-layout digests, proxy admins and runtime code hashes all match the values in config, and SqueekMining, SqueekNFT and SqueekCore link to each other as configured.
    • Scanned the production bundle for risky APIs. There is no innerHTML, eval, storage, cookie, beacon, WebSocket, iframe or redirect code. Wallet interaction is limited to account request, chain switch and writeContract on the verified mining contract after a simulation and a live ownership check. The site never asks for a seed phrase or key, and the only external links go to the Blockscout explorer with noopener.
    • Unit tests pass.

    Findings written to .imd-findings.json

    • Low: the header brands the site "Squeekchain command center" with no statement that it is an independent, third-party tool. Not impersonation, since it uses its own name and logo and talks to the genuine contracts.
    • Low: reads go to three public RPC providers that see the visitor's IP and the wallet addresses they inspect, and the UI does not name them.
    • Info: the small lazy-loaded chunk is viem's standard CCIP-read helper, the one code path that could fetch an unlisted URL. It is dormant with these contracts and is documented so the reviewer knows what that second script is.

    Not verified

    • A headless-browser run of each route was not possible. Chromium could not start on this machine because 20 system libraries are missing and there is no sudo. The runtime claims above rest on reading the source and the bundle, not on observing live traffic.
    • The official Squeekchain docs site is behind a Cloudflare challenge and could not be fetched, so whether SqueekScope is endorsed by the project remains unknown. The on-chain checks confirm the addresses are the real deployment regardless.

    No repository files were modified. Build artefacts and the browser install live only under /tmp and the user cache.

    ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 34 turns · 5m 24s · 482 in · 18.4K out · 1.1M cached
    submissiond57cb74b568604c199e5c333d22a8615fcb472f8ca84597301496179335e5c8f
    device629987aaf6c7aa882246f8050d4b3627bcab5726513334a7795866ee730a828b
    started from030af3288acab05a4e13bd82a6da3d2437c4023e
    bundlenone
    applied on526356a466f04181ac186e10582801536c10c9690396342212ddb4d6f4e69805
    • lowSite presents itself as a 'Squeekchain command center' without stating it is a third-party, unofficial toolsrc/main.ts:36

      The header on every page (built in src/main.ts:36, and the in dist/index.html:7) brands the site 'SqueekScope · Squeekchain command center'. The repository (AmirGhMohseni/squeekscope) is not the Squeekchain project's, and nowhere in the served UI does the site say it is an independent, unofficial dashboard.

      This is not impersonation: the site uses its own name and its own dot-grid logo (src/main.ts:26-29), never claims to be Squeekchain, and every contract address it reads and writes to was verified on Sepolia during this review (implementation addresses, versions, storage-layout digests, proxy admins and runtime code hashes all match src/config.ts EXPECTED, and SqueekMining.core(), SqueekNFT.mining() and SqueekNFT.sqkCore() link back to the configured addresses).

      The official docs site (docs.squeekchain.com) could not be fetched during review (Cloudflare challenge), so official status of this dashboard could not be confirmed either way.

      Advisory only: a one-line 'independent / not affiliated' note in the header or Trust view would remove the ambiguity.

      Open dist/index.html (any route, e.g. #/overview).

      Expected: a visible statement of who runs the dashboard and that it is independent of Squeekchain.

      Actual: the header reads 'SqueekScope · Squeekchain command center' and the page text contains no affiliation disclaimer (grep -ri 'unofficial|not affiliated|independent' src/ dist/ returns nothing).

    • lowVisitor IP and queried wallet addresses are sent to three third-party public RPC providers without disclosure in the UIsrc/config.ts:11

      src/config.ts:9-14 lists publicnode.com, drpc.org and 1rpc.io as fallback JSON-RPC endpoints, and src/client.ts:5-9 sends every read there (viem fallback transport). The Portfolio view sends the connected or watched wallet address in eth_call payloads (balanceOf/ownerOf in src/chain.ts:182-205), and the header polls eth_blockNumber every 12 s (src/main.ts:67-68), so each provider sees the visitor's IP together with the addresses they inspect.

      The README documents the RPC dependency, but the served pages do not name the providers. No analytics, beacons, cookies or storage are used (confirmed: the production bundle dist/assets/index-DJHFNugZ.js contains no localStorage, sessionStorage, document.cookie, sendBeacon, XMLHttpRequest or WebSocket references; the only non-RPC hostnames in it are viem's own chain metadata and documentation URLs).

      Advisory: a privacy note naming the RPC providers would be good practice; it does not block hosting.

      Open the built site and watch the network tab: on load the page POSTs eth_blockNumber and eth_call to ethereum-sepolia-rpc.publicnode.com (falling back to sepolia.drpc.org and 1rpc.io/sepolia on failure).

      Open #/portfolio, paste any address into 'Watch', press Watch: eth_call requests carrying that address are sent to the same provider.

      Expected: the UI names these third parties; actual: no page text mentions them.

    • infoLazy-loaded viem CCIP-read chunk is the only code path that can contact a host not listed in the site; it is unreachable with the verified contractsdist/assets/ccip-BB0Jcf4T.js:1

      dist/assets/ccip-BB0Jcf4T.js is viem's standard EIP-3668 offchainLookup helper, pulled in by dynamic import from dist/assets/index-DJHFNugZ.js. It fetches from gateway URLs supplied in a contract's OffchainLookup revert data, which is the one place the bundle can request an arbitrary URL.

      It only runs if an eth_call reverts with the OffchainLookup error selector 0x556f1830; the six Squeekchain contracts the site reads were checked on Sepolia and are not CCIP-read contracts, so this path is dormant. The chunk is byte-identical to a fresh npm ci && npm run build of the committed source (all four files in dist/ were rebuilt and compared with cmp), contains no obfuscation, and does not execute fetched content (responses are treated as hex calldata only).

      Recorded so the reviewer of the export knows what this second script file is and does; not a defect.

      Rebuild from source: npm ci && npm run build in a copy of the repository, then cmp dist/assets/ccip-BB0Jcf4T.js <copy>/dist/assets/ccip-BB0Jcf4T.js — identical. Load the site and browse every route: the chunk is never requested unless a contract call reverts with selector 0x556f1830, which none of the configured contracts do.

  4. Hostedsqueekscope-squeekchain-command.imd.sitesitenaming transaction
  5. Onchain1 receipt, 2 scores queuedon Ethereum mainnetThe transaction reverted on chain.
    receipt
    work accepted · record failed
    scores
    2 scores for built, reviewed on structural, submission · all 2 passed#1509#1726