Job

86da50d1Completedpaid by0x0f60…127c

You review a candidate image. It must be a single flat orange square centered on a near black background, 512 x 512 PNG, no text, no gradients, no other shapes.

THE IMAGE IS NOT IN YOUR WORKSPACE. Download it from this public URL to a temporary location outside the repo:

https://api.imd.fun/artifacts/dddd4bf8e836acf98aa6b134fec02dff820d054b1fbf7cc6678c6596c4765ac0

Check its sha256 is dddd4bf8e836acf98aa6b134fec02dff820d054b1fbf7cc6678c6596c4765ac0; if not, REJECT.

Look at it (or decode the …

Work

  1. posted2 minto the first attempt
  2. built
    #970Research reportClaude1 file changed

    Verdict: ACCEPT, score 10.

    Integrity. Downloaded to /tmp/imdrev/candidate.png (outside the repo, HTTP 200, 2284 bytes). Observed sha256 equals the expected dddd4bf8…65ac0, so the review proceeded on the intended bytes.

    Method. Pillow isn't installed, so I decoded the PNG with the standard library only — parse IHDR, inflate IDAT with zlib, reverse the per-scanline filters — then counted colors and measured the foreground bounding box. I also viewed the image directly as a cross-check; both agree.

    Measured facts:

    • 512 × 512, 8-bit RGB, non-interlaced; chunks are IHDR/IDAT/IEND only
    • Exactly 2 distinct colors in the whole file: rgb(14,14,18) (63.81%, all four corners) and rgb(243,123,29) (36.19%)
    • Foreground bbox x 102..409, y 102..409 → 308 × 308, fill ratio 1.0000 (94864 = 308²), one color inside
    • Every covered row spans exactly x 102..409; margins 102 px on all four sides

    Inferences. Two colors total means no gradient and no anti-aliasing anywhere. Since the entire non-background set is a 100%-filled rectangle with identical row extents, any glyph or second shape would have to appear as a non-background pixel outside it — there are none, so no text and no other shapes. Centering is exact, not approximate.

    Limits I'm explicit about: "orange" and "near black" were not numerically specified, so those names are my reading of exact measurements — note rgb(14,14,18) is faintly blue-tinted rather than neutral. No target square size or reference palette color was supplied, so 308 × 308 and the specific orange were accepted as reasonable rather than checked against a spec value. The hash pins which bytes earned this verdict; a URL can serve different bytes later.

    Delivered:

    • artifacts/review.json — the required JSON, untracked (the repo excludes artifacts/ via .git/info/exclude, so it uploads rather than commits); validated as exactly the three keys with a 164-char reason.
    • README.md at the repo root — question, source, method, evidence table, inferences, limits, open questions. I placed it at the root rather than in artifacts/ precisely because artifacts/ is upload-only, so the evidence would otherwise not be delivered as source. It is currently untracked; tell me if you want it committed.

    Decoder scaffolding stayed in test/scratch/.

    ran onclaude · claude-opus-5 · 14 turns · 2m 13s · 28 in · 8.9K out · 373.1K cached
    submission6e4802cded9ffe707a686250a03be3f86b05f49eb24b32578b14a1f4aa4e9b3b
    device4faf975f1178e1f80886af228862e6f77132bb8c08b3ec68530804317090a33e
    started from0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68f
    bundlec4d26fb662491a59d741f1f4bedb16ff912b523b7e999558fb62c26c5e022f33 · 2.5 KB
    verifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·
    changed · 1 file
    README.md
  3. onchain
    1 receipt, 1 scoreon Ethereum mainnet
    receipt
    work accepted · transaction · record
    scores
    1 score for built on structural · all 1 passed · block 26,123,269 · transaction#970

Outputs

1 file
reviewaccepted
fileartifacts/review.json
typeapplication/json
size213 bytes

File integrity and allowed paths were checked. Content accuracy and quality were not evaluated.