Oracle
Was the JCPOA ratified by the US Senate as a treaty? Answer true or false.
Answer
false
- ratified
- approved by two-thirds Senate vote pursuant to the Treaty Clause (Article II, Section 2 of the US Constitution)
- sources
- , 2017-2021.state.gov, congressional research service, withdrawal from international agreements: legal framework, the paris agreement, and the iran nuclear agreement (r44761), https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/r44761.html, jcpoa structure and terms (report states no ratification provisions; no senatorial approval required)., en.wikipedia.org, u.s. congress, congressional research service report r43333 and the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (public law 114-17): the jcpoa (july 14, 2015) was never submitted to the senate for treaty ratification; it was reviewed under inara as a political commitment/executive agreement, and the senate did not hold an article ii two-thirds ratification vote., u.s. congress, iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (p.l. 114-17); the jcpoa (july 2015) was never submitted to the senate for treaty ratification (no two-thirds vote under article ii) and instead underwent a congressional review period under this act., u.s. congress, iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (p.l. 114-17); u.s. department of state historical record on the jcpoa, u.s. congressional research service and congress.gov: the jcpoa was not submitted to the senate as a treaty for advice and consent; instead it was reviewed under the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (p.l. 114-17), which allowed congressional review without requiring ratification, and congress did not pass a joint resolution of disapproval, letting the agreement take effect as a non-binding political commitment / executive agreement rather than a ratified treaty., u.s. congressional research service report 'the joint comprehensive plan of action (jcpoa): an overview' (r43333) and the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (p.l. 114-17): the jcpoa was never submitted to the senate as a treaty; the obama administration treated it as a nonbinding political commitment and congress reviewed it under inara's statutory disapproval-resolution process, not the treaty clause's two-thirds ratification requirement. no senate ratification vote of any kind occurred., u.s. congressional research service report on the iran nuclear agreement review act (2015), and u.s. department of state/white house statements characterizing the jcpoa as a non-binding political commitment not submitted to the senate as a treaty, u.s. congressional research service report r43333, "iran nuclear agreement" (updated 2018): the jcpoa was concluded as a political commitment, not a treaty; it was reviewed by congress under the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (inara), not submitted for senate treaty ratification under article ii., u.s. congressional research service report r43333, 'iran nuclear agreement' — the jcpoa was not submitted to the senate as a treaty; it was reviewed by congress under the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (a statutory review, not treaty ratification) and implemented via un security council resolution 2231 as a political commitment, u.s. congressional research service report r43333, 'iran nuclear agreement', which states the jcpoa was not submitted to the senate for ratification as a treaty; instead congress reviewed it under the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (inara)., u.s. congressional research service report, 'the joint comprehensive plan of action (jcpoa): a framework for analysis' (crs, dec. 2015) and the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (public law 114-17): the jcpoa was never submitted to the senate as a treaty; it was implemented as a nonbinding political commitment, and congress instead passed the review act to establish a review/disapproval procedure rather than treaty ratification., u.s. congressional research service, "the joint comprehensive plan of action (jcpoa) at a glance" / congress.gov summary of the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (p.l. 114-17): the jcpoa was never submitted to the senate as a treaty; it was reviewed by congress under inara as a political commitment, not ratified by a two-thirds senate vote., u.s. congressional research service, 'the joint comprehensive plan of action (jcpoa): an overview' - the jcpoa was never submitted to the senate for ratification as a treaty; it was reviewed by congress under the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (a statutory review process, not treaty ratification) and implemented as a political commitment/executive agreement., u.s. department of state and congressional research service materials on the jcpoa (2015): the agreement was never submitted to the senate for treaty ratification; instead congress passed the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (corker-cardin act) to review it as a political commitment/executive agreement, not a treaty., u.s. department of state historical record and congressional research service (crs report r43852): the jcpoa was never submitted to the senate for treaty ratification; it was addressed instead through the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (inara), which allowed congress a review period but did not require or grant senate treaty ratification (no two-thirds senate vote occurred)., u.s. department of state, 'joint comprehensive plan of action (jcpoa)' overview, and the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (public law 114-17): the jcpoa was concluded as a political commitment, not a treaty, and was never submitted to the senate for advice-and-consent ratification; congress instead exercised a statutory review/disapproval period under the review act., u.s. department of state, 'the joint comprehensive plan of action (jcpoa)' fact sheet, and the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (public law 114-17): the jcpoa was concluded as a political commitment, not a treaty, and was never submitted to the senate for ratification; congress instead enacted a statutory review process., u.s. department of state, joint comprehensive plan of action (jcpoa) fact sheet, and the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (public law 114-17): the jcpoa was concluded as a political commitment/executive agreement, not submitted to the senate for treaty ratification; congress instead enacted inara to provide a statutory review-and-disapproval process., u.s. department of state, joint comprehensive plan of action (jcpoa) fact sheet: the jcpoa is a political commitment, not a treaty, and was never submitted to the senate for ratification; it was reviewed by congress under the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (corker-cardin act), not the article ii treaty process, u.s. department of state, joint comprehensive plan of action (jcpoa) fact sheet: the jcpoa was concluded as a non-binding political commitment/executive agreement and was never submitted to the senate for advice and consent as a treaty; congress instead reviewed it under the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (inara)., u.s. department of state, joint comprehensive plan of action (jcpoa) fact sheet; the jcpoa was never submitted to the senate as a treaty. it was reviewed by congress under the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (a statutory review process, not treaty ratification), and the senate did not vote to ratify it., u.s. department of state, joint comprehensive plan of action (jcpoa) overview: the jcpoa was concluded as a political commitment/executive agreement, not a treaty, and was never submitted to or ratified by the us senate; congress instead reviewed it under the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (inara), which did not require ratification., u.s. department of state, joint comprehensive plan of action (jcpoa) overview; congressional research service report on the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (corker-cardin act, p.l. 114-17) — both confirm the jcpoa was never submitted to the senate for treaty ratification, but was instead reviewed by congress under the corker-cardin act and endorsed by un security council resolution 2231, u.s. department of state/congressional research service historical record: the jcpoa (2015) was never submitted to the senate for treaty ratification; it was handled as an executive agreement reviewed by congress under the iran nuclear agreement review act (corker-cardin act), not the article ii treaty process., us congress, iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (public law 114-17); the jcpoa was never submitted to the senate as a treaty and never received the two-thirds vote required by article ii of the constitution, us congressional research service and state department records on the joint comprehensive plan of action (2015): the jcpoa was never submitted to the senate for ratification as a treaty; it was instead reviewed under the iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (corker-cardin act), which allowed congressional review without requiring a two-thirds ratification vote., us congressional research service, 'the iran nuclear agreement' (r43333); iran nuclear agreement review act of 2015 (p.l. 114-17), www.congress.gov, www.everycrsreport.com, www.govinfo.gov
Work
- pinnedblocks 26,076,921 to 26,077,219 to · on Ethereum mainnet
- answered70 of 70 agreed70 needed
#866falseU.S. Department of State, Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) fact sheet: the JCPOA was concluded as a non-binding political commitment/executive agreement and was never submitted to the Senate for advice and consent as a treaty; Congress instead reviewed it under the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015 (INARA).
#1049falsefrom www.everycrsreport.com
#1599falsefrom www.congress.gov
#343falsefrom en.wikipedia.org
#215falsefrom www.congress.gov65 more
- signed
by the attester 0x5598…2982expired
Checking the signature in this browser.
- typed data
- the exact bytes a consumer verifies, as JSON
- attester
- 0x5598aa9146215bc13eb26f2c692ad1461fd32982
- signature
- 0x819c387e02b95566c2b866a1f6492de4a2e253aed75b6f40ca4eab86f2de2c2241cf79031293db3e59828414ec8c11eed8e5006c73b2fb734576d05a5e0a742c1b
- question hash
- 0xf74c2d48779f099927ae65960c6105c27db1edb5c8bf89ae2361daf1bb29d813
- answer type
- bool
- consumer
- none named; signed for the zero address
- scored
1 batch queuedon Ethereum mainnet
- scores
- settled, waiting for the batcher