Third test of owner actions (mode 0), on Ethereum mainnet, with real ETH, chain 1: a decision taken by five machines. The goal's owner, 0x047f606fd5b2baa5f5c6c4ab8958e45cb6b054b7, signs this goal the mandate 0x384901bddda3b10173014f3d939ecf84f64afcad95786d955f62b4ed3736a9f2, quorum 3, which lets it send native ETH only to 0xb7a832db45f240f876432bf8b222bff30b4be8ff, 0xbe11d80c27863c950485d269992dc086e9f397a9, 0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2, at most 0.002 ETH a day.

Do this and nothing else:

Spawn one batch named top-up with {"intents": true, "replicas": {"size": 5, "quorum": 4}, "chain": {"chainId": 1, "pin": "head", "accounts": ["0xb7a832db45f240f876432bf8b222bff30b4be8ff", "0xbe11d80c27863c950485d269992dc086e9f397a9", "0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2"]}} and exactly 1 item, so five independent machines each read the chain at the same pinned block and write the item. The item's instructions, word for word: Read the native ETH balance of each of these accounts at the block .imd/reads/chain.json pins (its accounts give them; or eth_getBalance at exactly that block, never latest): 0xb7a832db45f240f876432bf8b222bff30b4be8ff, 0xbe11d80c27863c950485d269992dc086e9f397a9, 0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2. For each account, in exactly that order, whose balance is below 10000000000000000 wei (0.01 ETH), add one move {"asset":"native","to":"","amount":"500000000000000"}. Skip every account at or above it. Write, as your whole result, one asset-intent@1 and nothing else:

{"schema":"asset-intent@1","chainId":1,"kind":"treasury.rebalance","moves":[],"approvals":[],"rationale":"<each account's balance in wei at the pinned block, and which you topped up>"}

Addresses in lowercase, amounts as decimal strings of wei, the moves in the order the accounts are listed above. 2. When top-up settles (goal.json lists it under withheld: you are not handed its files, and you need not be), check goal.json's mandates. Once 0x384901bddda3b10173014f3d939ecf84f64afcad95786d955f62b4ed3736a9f2 is there and active, act once: {"name":"top-up-1","intents":"top-up","mandate":"0x384901bddda3b10173014f3d939ecf84f64afcad95786d955f62b4ed3736a9f2","quorum":3}. Until it is, wake in 10 minutes and look again, at most 6 times. 3. If the act is refused, do not retry blindly: if the refusal says an item's intent has too few counted holders, spawn top-up-2 the same way and act on it as top-up-2, once. Any other refusal: write it up and finish. 4. Open no children, ask no oracle, set no watches, spawn no other batch. 5. Finish once an action is simulated, ready, sent or confirmed, or after the second refusal or the sixth wait. The write-up says what happened: each action's name, state and hash, and every refusal word for word.

The answer

Third test of owner actions (mode 0) on Ethereum mainnet: top-up

Outcome

The goal finished on its own stopping condition: one action reached state ready.

Action	Intents batch	Mandate	Quorum	Last reported state	Hash
`top-up-1`	`top-up`	`0x384901bddda3b10173014f3d939ecf84f64afcad95786d955f62b4ed3736a9f2`	3	`ready`	`0x89c2567a2df0da62ba7ce9bd4cb2528dabdba7dc27fd001719fabf3abbbd0595`

Refusals: none. goal.json.refused was empty in every episode.
top-up-2 was never spawned and never acted on, because no refusal occurred.
No ETH transfer is established as sent or confirmed. The mandate is mode 0, so the owner 0x047f606fd5b2baa5f5c6c4ab8958e45cb6b054b7 must send the compiled action from their own wallet. The last state the plane reported is ready, with the detail "simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner".
The goal built no code. trunk is null in goal.json, so there is no repository or commit to name.

What was asked

The objective asked for exactly one intent batch named top-up, run on five independent machines reading Ethereum mainnet (chain 1) at one pinned block, followed by exactly one action under the owner's mandate once that batch settled. Each machine was to read the native ETH balance of three accounts at the pinned block and write one asset-intent@1 of kind treasury.rebalance, adding a move of 500000000000000 wei (0.0005 ETH) to each account whose balance was below 10000000000000000 wei (0.01 ETH), in the listed order, and skipping the rest.

The allowed recipients, per the objective, are:

0xb7a832db45f240f876432bf8b222bff30b4be8ff
0xbe11d80c27863c950485d269992dc086e9f397a9
0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2

What happened, episode by episode

The goal ran 5 of its 14 allowed episodes and used 1 of its 12 items. Every statement below comes from the orchestrator's notes and the batch, withheld, refused and action records in .imd/reads/goal.json.

Episode 1: spawn

The decision spawned the batch top-up with the objective's settings and nothing else:

intents: true, replicas: {size: 5, quorum: 4}, exactly 1 item
chain: {chainId: 1, pin: "head", accounts: [the three addresses above, in order]}
The item brief copied word for word from the objective (quoted in full below)
No action, no read, no child, no ask, no watch

Episode 2: chain read complete, item running

The plane's chain read for top-up finished. Every replica of the item was handed the same snapshot:

Field	Value
Chain	Ethereum mainnet, chainId 1
Pinned block	26381929
Block hash	`0x6e659ea5b9a6b74d4bd2c61629b21033a6b0a5a3c32a1802a58641023d00d042`

The item was running with 0 accepted, 0 failed, 0 waiting. The wake received was an effect.snapshot completion, not a batch settlement, so the episode kept waiting on the same batch and did not count the wait against the six mandate waits.

The mandate 0x384901bddda3b10173014f3d939ecf84f64afcad95786d955f62b4ed3736a9f2 was listed in goal.json.mandates as active from this episode on: chain 1, mode 0, quorum 3, expiresAt 2026-12-10T03:51:49.000Z. Its visible scope summary listed only the IMD launch factory 0x12c63b581d07093f6126bc02263c58f7eadaa96f with claimFees(uint64). The orchestrator reference says a mandate's recipients, allowances and argument rules are not shown in goal.json, so the ETH recipient scope the objective describes could not be confirmed from the summary and was left to the plane to enforce at compile time. It did compile, which is consistent with the scope the objective describes.

Episode 3: batch settled, action requested once

top-up settled: 1 item total, 1 accepted, 0 failed, 0 running, 0 waiting. goal.json listed it under withheld with settled: true, so its intent files were never handed to the orchestrator, as the objective anticipated. The mandate was still active. The decision requested exactly one action:

{"name":"top-up-1","intents":"top-up","mandate":"0x384901bddda3b10173014f3d939ecf84f64afcad95786d955f62b4ed3736a9f2","quorum":3}

Episode 4: simulating

goal.json.actions listed top-up-1: lane owner, kinds ["treasury.rebalance"], state simulating, hash 0x89c2567a2df0da62ba7ce9bd4cb2528dabdba7dc27fd001719fabf3abbbd0595, detail "waiting for the simulator". An effect.action wake at 2026-11-10T03:57:25.786Z reported the same. Simulating is not a finishing state, so the episode waited with a 10-minute fallback and requested nothing.

Episode 5: ready, finish

An action.ready wake at 2026-11-10T03:57:42.843Z carried payload name top-up-1, state ready, same hash. goal.json.actions agreed: state ready, detail "simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner". The objective says to finish once an action is simulated, ready, sent or confirmed, so the decision set finish: true and requested nothing else.

Mandate waits, refusals and other limits

Limit from the objective	Used
Mandate waits (10 minutes each, at most 6)	0 of 6: the mandate was active before the batch settled
Act refusals (finish on the second)	0
`top-up-2` (only after a too-few-holders refusal)	not spawned
Children, oracle asks, watches, other batches	none
Items	1 of 12
Episodes	5 of 14

Every refusal word for word: there were none to quote.

The item brief, word for word

The batch top-up carried this brief, copied from the objective:

Read the native ETH balance of each of these accounts at the block .imd/reads/chain.json pins (its accounts give them; or eth_getBalance at exactly that block, never latest): 0xb7a832db45f240f876432bf8b222bff30b4be8ff, 0xbe11d80c27863c950485d269992dc086e9f397a9, 0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2. For each account, in exactly that order, whose balance is below 10000000000000000 wei (0.01 ETH), add one move {"asset":"native","to":"","amount":"500000000000000"}. Skip every account at or above it. Write, as your whole result, one asset-intent@1 and nothing else: {"schema":"asset-intent@1","chainId":1,"kind":"treasury.rebalance","moves":[],"approvals":[],"rationale":"<each account's balance in wei at the pinned block, and which you topped up>"} Addresses in lowercase, amounts as decimal strings of wei, the moves in the order the accounts are listed above.

The brief asks one item for one piece of work and says exactly what its result must contain. goal.json shows the brief truncated after "Skip every ac…"; the full text above is the objective's, which the episode 1 decision copied unchanged.

What the withheld intent should contain: an independent check

The five replicas' intent files were withheld throughout and never handed to the orchestrator, so their moves and rationales cannot be quoted. To let a reader judge what the ready action most likely carries, I re-read Ethereum mainnet at the batch's pinned block with an archive eth_getBlockByNumber and three eth_getBalance calls at block 26381929 exactly. This is my own check, made while writing the report, not a goal result.

The block hash returned, 0x6e659ea5b9a6b74d4bd2c61629b21033a6b0a5a3c32a1802a58641023d00d042, matches the batch's snapshot. Its timestamp is 2026-11-10T03:50:35Z.

Account	Balance at block 26381929 (wei)	Below 0.01 ETH?	Expected move
`0xb7a832db45f240f876432bf8b222bff30b4be8ff`	1634690350554818	yes (about 0.0016 ETH)	500000000000000 wei to this account
`0xbe11d80c27863c950485d269992dc086e9f397a9`	706349479506548120	no (about 0.706 ETH)	skip
`0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2`	2113238420561957318780456	no (about 2,113,238 ETH, the WETH contract)	skip

If the five machines followed the brief, each wrote an intent with exactly one move: 0.0005 ETH native to 0xb7a832db45f240f876432bf8b222bff30b4be8ff. That is within the mandate's 0.002 ETH daily allowance and goes to one of its three listed recipients, which is consistent with the action compiling and simulating under the mandate and reaching ready. The plane's own compile, not this check, is what the action rests on.

What is missing

The intent files of top-up were withheld, so the exact moves and rationales the five holders wrote are not quoted here. The check above shows what the brief required at that block.
The counted-holder total behind top-up-1 is not shown in goal.json. The action compiled with quorum 3 under a batch of 5 replicas and quorum 4, and no refusal about counted holders occurred.
sent and confirmed were not reached while the goal ran. Whether the owner has since sent the transaction is outside this record. Any later state change would wake the goal, and the episode 5 notes instruct any later episode to record the new state and hash verbatim and finish again without new actions or batches.

Sources

.imd/reads/goal.json: objective, notes for episodes 1 to 5, batches[top-up] (chain snapshot, items, replicas, withheld, settled), withheld, refused (empty), trunk (null), goal.items (1 of 12).
The orchestrator's episode 4 and 5 notes, which record goal.json.actions for top-up-1 (states simulating and ready, hash, details) and the effect.action and action.ready wakes at 2026-11-10T03:57:25.786Z and 2026-11-10T03:57:42.843Z.
The orchestrator's episode 2 to 5 notes, which record goal.json.mandates for 0x384901bddda3b10173014f3d939ecf84f64afcad95786d955f62b4ed3736a9f2 (active, chain 1, mode 0, quorum 3, expiresAt 2026-12-10T03:51:49.000Z).
My own archive reads of Ethereum mainnet at block 26381929, described above.

report.md

The swarm

finishedran 13 minItems, page by page →

Round 1top-up1 of 1 back
Agent #341 planned it. Started 1 min after the job was posted.
what top-up was asked
Read the native ETH balance of each of these accounts at the block .imd/reads/chain.json pins (its accounts give them; or eth_getBalance at exactly that block, never latest): 0xb7a832db45f240f876432bf8b222bff30b4be8ff, 0xbe11d80c27863c950485d269992dc086e9f397a9, 0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2. For each account, in exactly that order, whose balance is below 10000000000000000 wei (0.01 ETH), add one move {"asset":"native","to":"<that account>","amount":"500000000000000"}. Skip every account at or above it. Write, as your whole result, one asset-intent@1 and nothing else: {"schema":"asset-intent@1","chainId":1,"kind":"treasury.rebalance","moves":[<the moves>],"approvals":[],"rationale":"<each account's balance in wei at the pinned block, and which you topped up>"} Addresses in lowercase, amounts as decimal strings of wei, the moves in the order the accounts are listed above.
the whole memo
Episode 1: the supplied goal state has no batches, handed results, prior notes or refusals, and no mandates or actions are listed. Items used: 0 of 12; episode 1 of 14. This decision requests only top-up: one item, five replicas, acceptance quorum 4, Ethereum mainnet chain 1, head pinned by the plane, and the three specified accounts in order. The item brief is copied word for word from the objective. No action is requested in this episode. Mandate waits completed: 0 of 6. Actions attempted: none. Action hashes: none. Refusals: none. Wake on top-up settlement or after 10 minutes. If a wake arrives before settlement, check its status and keep waiting for that same batch; do not spawn it again or count batch-processing time as a mandate wait. Intent files remain withheld; no result reads are needed. Once goal.json shows top-up settled under withheld, check mandates. If 0x384901bddda3b10173014f3d939ecf84f64afcad95786d955f62b4ed3736a9f2 is listed and active, request exactly once {"name":"top-up-1","intents":"top-up","mandate":"0x384901bddda3b10173014f3d939ecf84f64afcad95786d955f62b4ed3736a9f2","quorum":3}. Otherwise schedule a 10-minute wake and recheck, at most six such waits; carry the count forward and finish after the sixth wait if still inactive. For an act refusal, preserve its complete wording. Only if the first act refusal says an item intent has too few counted holders, spawn top-up-2 once with the same exact brief, one item, replicas size 5/quorum 4, and the same chain settings; after it settles, act once as top-up-2, intents top-up-2, under the same active mandate and quorum 3. Finish on any other act refusal or the second act refusal. Never retry an action blindly. Finish once an action is simulated, ready, sent or confirmed. Preserve each action name, reported state and hash, and every refusal verbatim for the final write-up. Open no children, ask no oracle, set no watches, and spawn no other batch.
1 step
top-up, item by item
Round 2Episode 2 of 14: top-up already exists with exactly one item and replicas size 5, quorum 4.
Agent #1342 planned it.
the whole memo
Episode 2 of 14: top-up already exists with exactly one item and replicas size 5, quorum 4. Its Ethereum chain read is complete at block 26381929, hash 0x6e659ea5b9a6b74d4bd2c61629b21033a6b0a5a3c32a1802a58641023d00d042. The effect.snapshot wake reports the snapshot completed, not the intent batch: both batches and withheld explicitly say settled=false. The item is running; accepted=0, failed=0, waiting=0. No results were handed over. Items used: 1 of 12. No new batch, read, cancellation or action is requested. Keep top-up running and wake when it settles or after 10 minutes. finish=false because no action outcome or stopping condition exists. Mandate waits completed: 0 of 6; this wake and the present wait concern batch processing, not an inactive mandate. The specified mandate 0x384901bddda3b10173014f3d939ecf84f64afcad95786d955f62b4ed3736a9f2 is now listed active on chain 1, mode 0, quorum 3, expiresAt 2026-12-10T03:51:49.000Z. Its visible scope lists only the IMD launch factory 0x12c63b581d07093f6126bc02263c58f7eadaa96f and claimFees(uint64); the reference says recipients and allowances are not shown. Do not infer transfer approval from that summary or alter the requested intent; the plane must enforce the mandate when the requested action is proposed. Actions attempted: none. Action names, states and hashes: none reported. Refusals: none. Next episode: inspect current batches, withheld, mandates, actions and refused. If top-up remains unsettled, continue waiting for that same batch without respawning it or counting processing time as a mandate wait. Once top-up is settled and the specified mandate is still active, request exactly once {"name":"top-up-1","intents":"top-up","mandate":"0x384901bddda3b10173014f3d939ecf84f64afcad95786d955f62b4ed3736a9f2","quorum":3}. If the mandate is absent or inactive at settlement, schedule 10-minute rechecks, carrying the completed mandate-wait count forward, at most six waits; finish after the sixth wait if still unable to act. If the first act is refused specifically because an item intent has too few counted holders, preserve the refusal word for word and spawn top-up-2 once, with the objective's item instructions copied word for word, exactly one item, intents=true, replicas size 5/quorum 4, and chainId 1, pin=head, the same three accounts in their specified order. After top-up-2 settles and the same mandate is active, act exactly once with name=top-up-2, intents=top-up-2, that mandate and quorum=3. Any other first act refusal or a second refusal ends the goal with its full wording recorded. Do not retry blindly. Finish once an action is simulated, ready, sent or confirmed. Preserve each action's name, exact reported state and hash, and every refusal verbatim for the final write-up; do not report a transfer as sent without that reported state. Open no children, ask no oracle, set no watches, and spawn no batch other than the single conditional top-up-2.
1 step
Round 3Episode 3 of 14: top-up is settled in both batches and withheld, with one accepted item, zero failed, zero running and zero waiting.
Agent #65 planned it.
the whole memo
Episode 3 of 14: top-up is settled in both batches and withheld, with one accepted item, zero failed, zero running and zero waiting. Its configured replicas are size 5, quorum 4; the summary does not give the counted-holder total or reveal the intent contents. The Ethereum mainnet snapshot is block 26381929, hash 0x6e659ea5b9a6b74d4bd2c61629b21033a6b0a5a3c32a1802a58641023d00d042. No results were handed over. Items used: 1 of 12. Mandate 0x384901bddda3b10173014f3d939ecf84f64afcad95786d955f62b4ed3736a9f2 is listed active on chain 1, mode 0, quorum 3, expiresAt 2026-12-10T03:51:49.000Z. Its visible scope lists the IMD launch factory and claimFees(uint64); the reference says argument rules, allowances, spenders and recipients are not shown. The plane must enforce those restrictions on the requested intent. This decision proposes exactly the authorized first action: name top-up-1, intents top-up, the specified mandate, quorum 3. No previous actions or refusals appear in the supplied state. top-up-1 is requested by this decisions file; its actual action state and hash are not yet reported. Refusals so far: none. No new batch, result read or cancellation is requested. finish=false because proposing an action is not its outcome. Wake on an action change, with a 10-minute fallback; do not wait on the already-settled batch. Mandate waits completed: 0 of 6. This fallback concerns the action outcome and does not increment the inactive-mandate wait count. Next episode: inspect actions and refused, preserve each action's name, exact reported state and hash, and every refusal word for word. Do not submit top-up-1 again. Finish once an action is reported simulated, ready, sent or confirmed; simulating alone is not completed simulation. If the first act is refused specifically because an item's intent has too few counted holders, preserve the full refusal and spawn top-up-2 once, using the objective's item instructions word for word, exactly one item, intents=true, replicas size 5/quorum 4, and chainId 1, pin=head, with accounts in this order: 0xb7a832db45f240f876432bf8b222bff30b4be8ff, 0xbe11d80c27863c950485d269992dc086e9f397a9, 0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2. After top-up-2 settles, check the same mandate is active and act once with name top-up-2, intents top-up-2, that mandate and quorum 3. If the mandate is absent or inactive before that action, schedule 10-minute rechecks, carry the completed count forward, and finish after the sixth mandate wait. Any other first act refusal or the second refusal ends the goal, with the full wording retained for the write-up. Never retry blindly. Open no children, ask no oracle, set no watches, and spawn no other batch. Report only observed action states and hashes; do not claim ETH was sent without the reported outcome.
1 step
Round 4Episode 4 of 14: top-up-1 was requested once in episode 3 and is now listed in goal.json.actions with name=top-up-1, state=simulating, hash=0x89c2567a2df0da62ba…
Agent #973 planned it.
It carried nothing out: it decided nothing while nothing was running.
the whole memo
Episode 4 of 14: top-up-1 was requested once in episode 3 and is now listed in goal.json.actions with name=top-up-1, state=simulating, hash=0x89c2567a2df0da62ba7ce9bd4cb2528dabdba7dc27fd001719fabf3abbbd0595, lane=owner, kinds=[treasury.rebalance], detail="waiting for the simulator". This is the only reported action. The effect.action wake at 2026-11-10T03:57:25.786Z has outer state=done, but its result reports the same action state=simulating and hash; the completed effect does not establish completed simulation or a sent transaction. Refusals so far: none; goal.json.refused is empty. No completed simulation, ready, sent or confirmed outcome is reported. Therefore finish=false, with a 10-minute fallback wake while awaiting an action-state change. Do not submit top-up-1 again. No new action, batch, result read or cancellation is requested in this episode, and no children, oracle asks or watches are opened. The existing top-up batch is settled in both batches and withheld, with exactly one accepted item and zero failed, running or waiting. Its configured replicas are size 5 and quorum 4; no counted-holder total or intent contents are supplied. Its chain 1 snapshot is block 26381929, hash 0x6e659ea5b9a6b74d4bd2c61629b21033a6b0a5a3c32a1802a58641023d00d042. No results were handed over. Items used: 1 of 12; 11 remain. Mandate 0x384901bddda3b10173014f3d939ecf84f64afcad95786d955f62b4ed3736a9f2 remains listed active on chain 1, mode 0, quorum 3, expiresAt 2026-12-10T03:51:49.000Z. Mandate waits completed: 0 of 6. The present wake concerns an existing action's outcome and does not increment the inactive-mandate wait count. Next episode: inspect actions and refused. Preserve every action's exact name, state, hash and detail, and every refusal word for word for the final write-up. Finish as soon as an action is reported simulated, ready, sent or confirmed; simulating alone does not satisfy that condition. If top-up-1 is still simulating without refusal, continue awaiting its change with a 10-minute fallback, without duplicating it or spawning a batch. Only if the first action is refused specifically because an item's intent has too few counted holders, preserve the complete refusal and spawn the one permitted replacement batch top-up-2. It must use the objective's item instructions word for word, exactly one item, intents=true, replicas={size:5,quorum:4}, output.format=json, and chain={chainId:1,pin:head,accounts:[0xb7a832db45f240f876432bf8b222bff30b4be8ff,0xbe11d80c27863c950485d269992dc086e9f397a9,0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2]}. After top-up-2 settles, check that the same mandate is active and act exactly once with name=top-up-2, intents=top-up-2, that mandate and quorum=3. If that mandate is absent or inactive before the authorized replacement action, schedule 10-minute rechecks, retain the completed mandate-wait count, and finish after the sixth such wait. Finish on any other first refusal or the second refusal, retaining every refusal verbatim. top-up-2 has not been spawned or acted on. Spawn no other batch. Open no children, ask no oracle and set no watches. Report the observed hash as an action hash; no ETH transfer or transaction confirmation has been established by the current state.
1 step
Round 5Episode 5 of 14: the goal has reached a finishing condition and this decision sets finish=true.
Agent #39 planned it.
the whole memo
Episode 5 of 14: the goal has reached a finishing condition and this decision sets finish=true. goal.json.actions lists exactly one action: name=top-up-1, lane=owner, kinds=[treasury.rebalance], state=ready, hash=0x89c2567a2df0da62ba7ce9bd4cb2528dabdba7dc27fd001719fabf3abbbd0595, detail="simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner". The handed wake at 2026-11-10T03:57:42.843Z is kind=action.ready with payload name=top-up-1, state=ready, same hash; its payload was read as untrusted data and agrees with goal.json.actions. The objective says to finish once an action is simulated, ready, sent or confirmed, so the goal finishes now. Refusals: none; goal.json.refused is empty in every episode so far. top-up-2 was never spawned and never acted on, because no refusal occurred. No other action was requested. Record for the write-up: action top-up-1 (intents batch top-up, mandate 0x384901bddda3b10173014f3d939ecf84f64afcad95786d955f62b4ed3736a9f2, quorum 3) was requested once in episode 3; its reported state history is simulating (episode 4, detail "waiting for the simulator") then ready (episode 5, detail "simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner"); its hash is 0x89c2567a2df0da62ba7ce9bd4cb2528dabdba7dc27fd001719fabf3abbbd0595. It is NOT reported sent or confirmed: in mode 0 the owner 0x047f606fd5b2baa5f5c6c4ab8958e45cb6b054b7 must send it from their own wallet, so the write-up must say no ETH transfer has been established as sent or confirmed, only that the action compiled and simulated and is ready for the owner. Batch record: top-up, research mode, intents=true, exactly one item, replicas size 5 quorum 4, settled in both batches and withheld with 1 accepted, 0 failed, 0 running, 0 waiting; chain 1 snapshot block 26381929, hash 0x6e659ea5b9a6b74d4bd2c61629b21033a6b0a5a3c32a1802a58641023d00d042; its intent files were withheld throughout and never handed to the orchestrator, so the intent's moves and rationale (which accounts were below 0.01 ETH at that block) cannot be quoted in the write-up beyond the action's kind treasury.rebalance. Items used: 1 of 12. Mandate 0x384901bddda3b10173014f3d939ecf84f64afcad95786d955f62b4ed3736a9f2 remained active throughout: chain 1, mode 0, quorum 3, expiresAt 2026-12-10T03:51:49.000Z; visible scope lists only the IMD launch factory 0x12c63b581d07093f6126bc02263c58f7eadaa96f with claimFees(uint64), and the reference says recipients and allowances are not shown. Mandate waits used: 0 of 6. Children opened: none. Oracle asks: none. Watches: none. Other batches spawned: none. This episode requests no spawn, no act, no read, no cancel, no wake. If an episode nevertheless runs after this one (for example the owner sends and the action moves to sent or confirmed, or it is denied, expired or failed), do not request any new action or batch: record the new state and hash verbatim and finish again.
1 step
Write-upAgent #1842made 1 file
The report is written and verified. Nothing else remains to request.

Deliverable: artifacts/goal/writeup/report.md, Markdown, 9,784 bytes, left untracked for the daemon to upload. No .imd-blocked.json was needed.

What the report records, from the goal's notes and batch records:

One batch, top-up. Intent batch, one item, five replicas with quorum 4, Ethereum mainnet pinned at block 26381929 with hash 0x6e65…d042. It settled with 1 accepted, 0 failed, and its intent files stayed withheld as the objective anticipated.

One action, top-up-1. Requested once in episode 3 under mandate 0x3849…a9f2 with quorum 3. Its state went from simulating to ready, hash 0x89c2…0595, detail "simulated within what it declares: waiting for its owner". The goal finished on that state in episode 5.

Refusals: none. top-up-2 was never spawned. Mandate waits used: 0 of 6. Items used: 1 of 12. Episodes: 5 of 14. No children, asks, watches or other batches. No code was built, so there is no trunk to name.

Not established: no ETH is reported sent or confirmed. In mode 0 the owner must send from their own wallet, and the report says so plainly.

Independent check I added, labeled as my own. I re-read chain 1 at the pinned block. The block hash matched the batch's snapshot. Only the first account was below 0.01 ETH, at about 0.0016 ETH, so a brief-following intent would carry one move of 0.0005 ETH to 0xb7a8…e8ff. That fits the mandate's recipients and daily cap and is consistent with the action compiling and reaching ready. The report also lists what is missing: the withheld intent contents and the counted-holder total.
ran onclaude · claude-fable-5-1 · 8 turns · 2m 24s · 162 in · 7.7K out · 257.4K cached
submissiona69cc4fd312b43133f3a5eb2bd939567e580fff68847ab5d8d7a2b27b5088fd8
device0eca5d6d7ad6ddb47e81e2e533a069b9ec3a436b27ba5c360a4dda3013256c32
started from0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68f
bundlenone
verifiedrebuilt and matched · verifier 0.1.0 ·
made · 1 file
artifacts/goal/writeup/report.md · 9.8 KB
may write
artifacts/goal/writeup/**
JudgeAgent #1799found nothing
No substantiated defects found. Wrote {"findings":[]} to .imd-findings.json.

Verified the pinned-block balances and calculations. Action history could not be independently verified because the cited execution logs weren’t supplied.
ran oncodex · gpt-6-astra · 3 turns · 1m 38s · 20.7K in · 3.3K out · 90.8K cached
submission278777ee28789405c70e3dd684fcb55bb307c6aec060d24cc94ec162090c6ffb
device9676188abd3783f2ea0abf4a4c7ea62937ace1163061f7897102b314041e946e
started from0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68f
bundlenone
Publishedresearch report
Onchain1 receipton Ethereum mainnet
receipt
receipt 1 · transaction · record
scores
written, with no entries recorded on it · block 26,382,000 · transaction

8 agents at most, judge accepted

Outputs

7 files accepted

File integrity and allowed paths were checked. Content accuracy and quality were not evaluated.